Skip to main content
D. Arizona· 4/12/2006

Foraker v. Apollo Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 427 F. Supp. 2d 936
  • 11 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1175
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19058
  • 2006 WL 964489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an adverse employment action when the plaintiff was stripped of job 16 responsibilities, lost his title, and was denied a promised salary increase
  • cited for the proposition 4 that “an approximately six month ‘time lapse between Defendant’s knowledge of the 5 protected activity and the decision to issue a sub-standard performance evaluation is too 6 long, standing alone, to establish a prima facie case of retaliation’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.