D. Arizona· 4/12/2006
Foraker v. Apollo Group, Inc.
Citations
- 427 F. Supp. 2d 936
- 11 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1175
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19058
- 2006 WL 964489
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding an adverse employment action when the plaintiff was stripped of job 16 responsibilities, lost his title, and was denied a promised salary increase
- cited for the proposition 4 that “an approximately six month ‘time lapse between Defendant’s knowledge of the 5 protected activity and the decision to issue a sub-standard performance evaluation is too 6 long, standing alone, to establish a prima facie case of retaliation’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.