Footstar Corp. v. Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court lacked jurisdiction to review order that failed to specifically state on its face that a party was not entitled to the defense of workers’ compensation immunity as a matter of law
• dismissing appeal where order did not explicitly state that, as a matter of law, the employer was not entitled to rely on a workers’ compensation immunity defense at trial, and it did not enter judgment against the employer on the issue of immunity
• “The underlying wrong alleg edly committed by an employee in a negligent supervision or a negligent retention claim must be based on an injury resulting from a tort which is recognized under common law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).