Foote v. Chu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that permitting the plaintiff’s claim to proceed would require the “fact finder to have to substitute its judgment for the predictive judgment of the psychologist responsible for evaluating whether or not the Plaintiff posted a security threat . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).