Skip to main content
· 6/6/2025

Fooks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing ORS 498.002(1) as punishing “the unlawful acquisition of state property”
  • describing ORS 498.002(1) as punishing “the unlawful acquisition of state property”
  • “The state, as the party asserting that defendant’s conduct is separately punishable for purposes of ORS 161.067(3), bears the burden of adducing legally suf- ficient evidence of the requisite sufficient pause.” (Internal quotation marks and ellipses omitted.)
  • “The state, as the party asserting that defendant’s conduct is separately punishable for purposes of ORS 161.067(3), bears the burden of adducing legally suf- ficient evidence of the requisite sufficient pause.” (Internal quotation marks and ellipses omitted.)
  • “The state, as the party asserting that defendant’s conduct is separately punishable for purposes of ORS 161.067(3), bears the burden of adducing legally suf- ficient evidence of the requisite sufficient pause.” (Internal quotation marks and ellipses omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.