Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Civil Rights Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “including, but not limited to” language created a considerably discretionary standard
• concluding plaintiff who suffered from intermittent grand mal seizures due to epilepsy could maintain ICRA claim in spite of an administrative regulation that required the disability be “unrelated” to the plaintiffs’ ability to perform available jobs
• rejecting construction of a commission rule that “would effectively defeat the remedial purpose of” the ICRA
• epileptic condition must “present a risk of danger”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).