Food Planning Service Hawaii, Inc. v. Tran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a corporation—and the receiver standing in the corporation’s shoes—lacked standing because the corporation’s “primary existence was as a perpetrator of the Ponzi scheme [and] cannot be said to have suffered injury from the scheme it perpetrated”
• “A complaint need not anticipate and negate affirmative defenses and should not ordinarily be dismissed based on an affirmative defense unless the defense is apparent on the face of the complaint.”
• “A complaint need not anticipate and negate affirmative defenses and should not ordinarily be dismissed based on an affirmative defense unless the defense is apparent on the face of the complaint.”
• “A complaint need not anticipate and negate affirmative defenses and should not ordinarily be dismissed based on an affirmative defense unless the defense is apparent on the face of the complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).