Skip to main content
· 5/20/1996

Food Mart v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL

Citations

  • 471 S.E.2d 688
  • 322 S.C. 232
  • 1996 S.C. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • standing for the proposition that appellate review of an issue is barred when the issue was not raised or ruled on by the circuit court
  • matters not argued to or ruled on by the trial court are not preserved for review
  • matters not argued to or ruled on by the trial court are not preserved for review
  • matters not argued to or ruled on by trial court are not preserved for review
  • matters not argued to or ruled on by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review
  • matters not argued to or ruled on by trial court are not preserved for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.