· 5/20/1996
Food Mart v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
Citations
- 471 S.E.2d 688
- 322 S.C. 232
- 1996 S.C. LEXIS 75
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- standing for the proposition that appellate review of an issue is barred when the issue was not raised or ruled on by the circuit court
- matters not argued to or ruled on by the trial court are not preserved for review
- matters not argued to or ruled on by the trial court are not preserved for review
- matters not argued to or ruled on by trial court are not preserved for review
- matters not argued to or ruled on by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review
- matters not argued to or ruled on by trial court are not preserved for appellate review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.