· 5/25/2017
Food Market Merchandising, Inc v. Scottsdale Indemnity Company
Citations
- 857 F.3d 783
- 2017 WL 2271363
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 9089
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Here, we have disposition orders with ‘magic words’ but no evidence to support some of the crucial findings of fact and thus no support for the related conclusions of law.”
- “[T]his Court has previously held that parties are not allowed to make different arguments on appeal than before the trial court to swap horses between courts in order to get a better mount.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Murphy, Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.