Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Hyde

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that compliance by all participants, including the trial court, is required if the rule is to serve its purpose
• concluding that compliance by all participants, including the trial court, is required if the rule is to serve its purpose
• holding appellant substantially complied with Pa.R.A.P. 1925 by presenting copy of his Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement to the Prothonotary but not the trial judge
• holding appellant did not waive issues by failing to serve court-ordered Rule 1925(b) statement on trial judge where express language of court’s Rule 1925(b) order did not instruct appellant to serve copy of statement on trial judge
• finding it inequitable to deem issues waived due to an untimely-filed concise statement, where the trial court’s order does not comport with Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b)
• finding substantial compliance where the judge’s order was unclear and the appellant provided two time-stamped copies of his statement to the local prothonotary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).