Skip to main content
· 10/19/1925

Foo v. Weedin

Citations

  • 8 F.2d 221
  • 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • challenged jurors “scowled at government attorneys and agents during voir dire” and “their body language and facial expressions indicated disinterest in the proceedings”
  • challenged jurors “scowled at government attorneys and agents during voir dire” and “their body language and facial expressions indicated disinterest in the proceedings”
  • “Pretext can also be based on a finding that the factors used to explain the strike are irrelevant to a person’s ability to perform as a juror in the particular case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilbert, Mecamant, Rudkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.