· 10/19/1925
Foo v. Weedin
Citations
- 8 F.2d 221
- 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- challenged jurors “scowled at government attorneys and agents during voir dire” and “their body language and facial expressions indicated disinterest in the proceedings”
- challenged jurors “scowled at government attorneys and agents during voir dire” and “their body language and facial expressions indicated disinterest in the proceedings”
- “Pretext can also be based on a finding that the factors used to explain the strike are irrelevant to a person’s ability to perform as a juror in the particular case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilbert, Mecamant, Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.