Fontaine v. Bank of America, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on Rooker-Feldman doctrine because a state court had already ratified the foreclosure proceedings the plaintiff wished to challenge
• “Consequently, to the extent that the California courts have already ratified the foreclosure proceedings that Fontaine now seeks to challenge, this Court concludes that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine renders it without subject matter jurisdiction to review the instant complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).