Skip to main content
· 1/13/2014

Fonseca v. Small

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 990
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 839
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3408
  • 571 U.S. 1158
  • 2014 WL 103044
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • jury could reasonably infer deliberate indifference to a plaintiff’s right to refuse Risperdal where the defendant was giving prisoner unmarked pill

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.