Folsom v. Seapy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[c]ertification by the Attorney General is prima facie evidence that a federal employee was acting in the scope of her employment\
• holding that \[c]ertification by the Attorney General is prima facie evidence that a federal employee was acting in the scope of her employment\
• holding that “[c]ertification by the Attorney General is prima facie evidence that a federal employee was acting in the scope of her employment”
• stating that “§ 1983 provides no cause of action against federal agents acting under color of federal law”
• stating that “§ 1983 provides no cause of action against federal 27 agents acting under color of federal law”
• noting that the certification is 2 “prima facie evidence that a federal employee was acting in the scope of her employment at the 3 time of the incident”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).