Skip to main content
· 4/15/1905

Folkes v. Pratt

Citations

  • 86 Miss. 254

Syllabus

<p>Evidence. Written contract. Parol. Fraud.</p> <p>Fraud vitiates all contracts, and. the conditions of a contract are predicated of the idea that it is an honest undertaking; hence in a suit upon a written contract, or order for goods, containing a warranty of quality upon condition that the buyer should, within too limited a time after their reception, notify the seller of any objection on account of the quality of the goods, it is competent for the defendant to show by parol that the plaintiff intentionally and fraudulently substituted inferior goods to those ordered, and that owing to the nature of the goods the time granted by the contract for their examination was unreasonably short and the condition imposed an impossible one.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • municipally owned gas and water utility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teult

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.