Folkes v. New York College of Osteopathic Medicine of New York Institute of Technology

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding only institutional recipients of federal funds, not individuals, can be held liable under Title IX
• explaining that the application of the continuing violations theory in Title IX cases conflicts with the actual-notice standard set forth in Gebser v. Lago Vista Indep. Sch. Dist. , 524 U.S. 274 , 118 S.Ct. 1989 , 141 L.Ed.2d 277 (1998)
• granting summary judgment and finding “for the reasons stated . . . in regard to [plaintiff’s] Title VI claim” that plaintiff “presented wholly insufficient evidence of racial discrimination and [could not] invoke section 296(4) on that basis”
• “Title VI claims cannot be asserted against an individual defendant for the same reason that they cannot be asserted under Title IX—the individual is not a recipient of federal funding.”
• summarizing different standards courts have imposed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).