· 10/7/2013
Folino v. Johnson
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 61
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 253
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3189
- 571 U.S. 939
- 2013 WL 1455876
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 6536
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the district court’s finding that waiting three months to file 22 amended contentions after receiving new discovery is not diligent
- applying Brecht harmless error analysis to claim that admission of 13 evidence was improper
- applying the standard to each motion where cross motions were filed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.