· 6/20/2005
Folden v. United States
Citations
- 125 S. Ct. 2935
- 545 U.S. 1127
- 162 L. Ed. 2d 865
- 73 U.S.L.W. 3733
- 2005 U.S. LEXIS 4866
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An object plainly may ‘obstruct[ ] or impede[ ]’ without doing so permanently. Had the lawmakers intended ‘obstruction’ to [to be] permanent . . . , they could have simply added that adjective before ‘obstruction.’”
- “An object plainly may ‘obstruct[ ] or impede[ ]’ without doing so permanently. Had the lawmakers intended ‘obstruction’ to [to be] permanent . . . , they could have simply added that adjective before ‘obstruction.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.