· 12/30/2003
Foister v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Citations
- 295 F. Supp. 2d 693
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24274
- 2003 WL 23180234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- barring claim of addicted plaintiff for suit brought against narcotic manufacturers and marketers for failure to warn
- plaintiffs who procured and used OxyContin illegally could not recover in tort action against pharmaceutical company, because plaintiffs inevitably had to rely on their illegal actions to establish their claims
- plaintiffs who procured and used OxyContin illegally could not recover in tort action against pharmaceutical company, because plaintiffs inevitably had to rely on their illegal actions to establish their claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reeves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.