Skip to main content
· 12/30/2003

Foister v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.

Citations

  • 295 F. Supp. 2d 693
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24274
  • 2003 WL 23180234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • barring claim of addicted plaintiff for suit brought against narcotic manufacturers and marketers for failure to warn
  • plaintiffs who procured and used OxyContin illegally could not recover in tort action against pharmaceutical company, because plaintiffs inevitably had to rely on their illegal actions to establish their claims
  • plaintiffs who procured and used OxyContin illegally could not recover in tort action against pharmaceutical company, because plaintiffs inevitably had to rely on their illegal actions to establish their claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reeves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.