Fogt v. Fogt
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 1403
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by entertaining defendant-appellee's objections to the magistrate's decision despite defendant-appellee's failure to provide the trial court with transcripts of the hearings conducted by the magistrate. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by sustaining defendant-appellee's objections to the magistrate's decision and modifying the magistrate's decision.
Judges: Preston, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Cherry v. CherryOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 872×
- State ex rel. Duncan v. Chippewa Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court· 1995-10-11· cited 451×
- Huelskamp v. HuelskampOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-12-28· cited 44×
- Schwarck v. SchwarckOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-27· cited 19×
- Tewalt v. PeacockOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-04-11· cited 18×
- Siferd v. SiferdOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-20· cited 18×
- Muckensturm v. MuckensturmOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-02· cited 10×
- Collins v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-16· cited 6×
- Nieto v. MarcellinoOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-10· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.