Skip to main content
· 5/22/1964

Fogle v. United Steelworkers

Citations

  • 230 F. Supp. 797
  • 56 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2313
  • 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following the majority of courts in this circuit that mandate the same pleading requirements for affirmative defenses as for complaints
  • considering factors of “fairness, common sense and litigation efficiency” in deciding proper standard
  • “Given the disfavored status of Rule 12(f) motions to strike defenses . . . a defendant normally is allowed leave to amend the answer.”
  • “The majority of the district courts— including every district court within the Fourth Circuit to have considered the issue — have concluded that the plausibility standard articulated in Twombly and Iqbal applies to the pleading of affirmative defenses”
  • “Boilerplate defenses . . create unnecessary work and extend discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.