· 5/22/1964
Fogle v. United Steelworkers
Citations
- 230 F. Supp. 797
- 56 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2313
- 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7512
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- following the majority of courts in this circuit that mandate the same pleading requirements for affirmative defenses as for complaints
- considering factors of “fairness, common sense and litigation efficiency” in deciding proper standard
- “Given the disfavored status of Rule 12(f) motions to strike defenses . . . a defendant normally is allowed leave to amend the answer.”
- “The majority of the district courts— including every district court within the Fourth Circuit to have considered the issue — have concluded that the plausibility standard articulated in Twombly and Iqbal applies to the pleading of affirmative defenses”
- “Boilerplate defenses . . create unnecessary work and extend discovery.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.