Fogle v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding if it is in the interest of the State for the Attorney General to be able to challenge a judgment, the Attorney General “should be regarded as having standing to argue[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State ex rel. Hawley v. Pilot Travel Ctrs., LLC
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2018-08-21· cited 13×
• Carleton Properties, LLC v. Patterson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-02-22· cited 5×
• Kennedy v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-10-25· cited 5×
• Fogle v. Koster
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2012-08-28· cited 3×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphy v. Carron
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1976-05-05· cited 7,357×
• Missouri National Education Ass'n v. Missouri State Board of Education
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-12-26· cited 56×
• Kingsley v. Burack
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1976-04-14· cited 40×
• State ex rel. State v. Parkinson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2009-04-14· cited 33×
• State of Missouri v. Homesteaders Life Ass'n
  Eighth Circuit· 1937-05-27· cited 20×
• Preston v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-10-17· cited 17×
• In Re Salcedo
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-01-04· cited 7×
• Warlop Ex Rel. Warlop v. Warlop
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-06-03· cited 6×
• Simpson v. Shelker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-01-26· cited 5×
• Jackson v. City of Cassville
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-10-10· cited 3×