Fogle v. Monroe County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that home mortgagor’s negligent misrepresentation claim against mortgage loan servicer was barred by economic loss rule
• finding that home mortgagor’s negligent misrepresentation claim against mortgage loan servicer was barred by economic loss rule
• stating that “a party to a contract may seek alternative relief under both contract and quasi-contract theories” (quoting Woodcock v. Chase Home Fin., LLC, No. H–11–1199, 2012 WL 393260, at (S.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2012))
• accepting findings and 11 Pl.’s Orig. Pet. ¶ 2, ECF No. 1. 12 Id. at ¶¶ 32–42. 13 Defs.’ Br. 5, ECF No. 5. conclusions of the magistrate judge
• “[C]laims involving mental anguish cannot allow Plaintiff to subvert the effect of the economic loss rule.”
• “Because this action was removed from state court, the action may be construed as one brought under the federal Declaratory Judgment Act.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).