Skip to main content
· 11/20/1923

Fogarty v. Neal

Citations

  • 201 Ky. 85
  • 255 S.W. 1049
  • 1923 Ky. LEXIS 237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] motion for reconsideration ‘addresses only factual and legal matters that the Court may have overlooked . . . It is improper on a motion for reconsideration to ask the Court to rethink what [it] had already thought through—rightly or wrongly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.