Foad Consulting Group, Inc. v. Musil Govan Azzalino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that California state law—not Section 203—governed a corporate copyright owner’s (and non- statutory heir’s) attempt to terminate a licensing agreement
• summary judgment motion used to resolve whether contract created an implied, nonexclusive license in copyrighted work
• “[a] 26 nonexclusive copyright license may be granted orally or by implication”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).