FMS, Inc. v. Volvo Construction Equipment North America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When the parties brief an issue that has not been addressed by the district court, it is not unusual for this court to remand so that the district court may consider the issue in the first instance.”
• “the purpose of state franchise and dealership laws ‘is to protect franchisees who have unequal bargaining power once they have made a firm-specific investment in the franchisor.’” (quoting Wright-Moore Corp. v. Ricoh Corp., 908 F.2d 128, 135 (7th Cir. 1990))
• “the purpose of state franchise and dealership laws ‘is to protect franchisees who have unequal bargaining power once they have made a firm-specific investment in the franchisor.’” (quoting Wright-Moore Corp. v. Ricoh Corp., 908 F.2d 128, 135 (7th Cir. 1990))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).