FMA Financial Corp. v. Hansen Dairy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when all transactions are accomplished through an agent, the agent's knowledge of the transaction is imputed to the principal
• explaining that the parol evidence rule “serves a useful purpose in appropriate circumstances in safeguarding the integrity of [written] documents”
• explaining that the parol evidence rule “should not be applied with any such unreasoning rigidity as to defeat what may be shown to be the actual purpose and intent of the parties, but should be applied in the light of reason to serve the ends of justice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).