Skip to main content
· 9/15/1872

Flynn v. Hathaway

Citations

  • 65 Ill. 462

Syllabus

<p>1. Evidence—proof of execution when necessa/ry. Where a sheriff is sued for levying upon mortgaged chattels as the property of the mortgagor, by the assignee of the mortgage, the note described in the mortgage is not admissible in evidence' without proof of its execution.</p> <p>2. Law and fact. It is error for the court, in its instructions, to submit the question of the due execution of a chattel mortgage to the jury.</p> <p>3. Chattel mortgage. WLere the holder of a note secured by chattel mortgage sues an officer for levying upon and selling the mortgaged chattels under execution against the mortgagor, the production of the note and mortgage in evidence, or proof of their loss and contents, is indispensable to a recovery.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because defendant made no motion to strike and admonish, he is foreclosed from challenging the admission of the challenged testimony on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAllister

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.