S.D. Indiana· 7/3/2000
Flynn v. AerChem, Inc.
Citations
- 102 F. Supp. 2d 1055
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9563
- 2000 WL 959887
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- contract not unconscionable when plaintiff failed to suggest that he would not have signed the agreement absent pressure from the defendant
- an employer gives sufficient consideration when it bargains for an employee’s promise to arbitrate in exchange for its assent to be bound by the arbitrator’s decision
- agreement saying that acceptance was “in consideration and as a condition of [employment],” and employer’s promise to arbitrate all claims was sufficient consideration
- “[i]f [the plaintiff] signed the Agreement, even without full knowledge of its terms, [his] signature acts an acceptance of the Agreement’s terms”
- “It is a basic tenet of contract law that a person is assumed to have read and understood documents that they sign; a lack of understanding or failure to read the contract’s provisions does not relieve a party from the terms of that agreement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stadtlander v. Ryan's Family Steakhouses, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-04-04· cited 43×
- Jones v. Halliburton Co.S.D. Texas· 2008-05-09· cited 12×
- Joint Apprenticeship Comm. of United Ass'n Local Union No 307 v. Rezendes (In Re Rezendes)N.D. Indiana· 2004-02-05· cited 1×
- Hudson v. Indiana Limestone Co., Inc.S.D. Indiana· 2001-04-12
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 3,702×
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court· 1991-05-13· cited 2,511×
- Susan M. ROSENBERG, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and John Wyllys, Defendants, AppellantsFirst Circuit· 1999-02-24· cited 231×
- The Prudential Insurance Co. Of America, a New Jersey Corporation v. Justine Lai Elvira ViernesNinth Circuit· 1994-12-20· cited 194×
- Sheila Warnock SEUS, Appellant, v. JOHN NUVEEN & CO., INC.Third Circuit· 1998-06-08· cited 177×
- Mary KOVELESKIE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SBC CAPITAL MARKETS, INC. A/K/A SBC Warburg, Inc., Defendant-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1999-02-04· cited 162×
- Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-05-31· cited 146×
- Gibson v. Neighborhood Health Clinics, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1997-08-21· cited 146×
- Arthur H. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CIGNA FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC., Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsFifth Circuit· 1995-06-19· cited 136×
- Orr v. Westminster Village North, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 124×
- Shaw v. SS Kresge CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals· 1975-06-05· cited 59×
- Beauchamp v. Great West Life Ins. Assur. Co.E.D. Michigan· 1996-02-26· cited 42×
- Clanton v. United Skates of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-10-27· cited 29×
- Wilson Fertilizer & Grain, Inc. v. ADM Milling Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-08-17· cited 29×
- Leatherman v. Management Advisors, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-05-04· cited 22×
- Bain v. Board of Trustees of Starke Memorial HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals· 1990-02-20· cited 22×
- Houin v. Bremen State BankIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-07-28· cited 21×
- Day v. Bicknell Minerals, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-07-15· cited 15×
- Porter B. Williamson v. Bendix CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1961-04-27· cited 12×
- Rutter v. Excel Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-08-18· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.