Skip to main content
· 2/11/1959

Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 170 F. Supp. 422
  • 145 Ct. Cl. 1
  • 1959 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The document [the Warsaw Convention] being a writing accomplished by international agreement, an American court does not have the right to interpret it as freely as it might interpret an American statute or contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.