· 2/11/1959
Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 170 F. Supp. 422
- 145 Ct. Cl. 1
- 1959 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 68
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The document [the Warsaw Convention] being a writing accomplished by international agreement, an American court does not have the right to interpret it as freely as it might interpret an American statute or contract.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Madden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.