Fluoro Electric Corporation v. Branford Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no error in granting the plaintiff’s motion for correction of a misnamed party defendant and in directing clerk to delete the words “a corporation” from the defendant’s name in the judgment, pursuant to FRCP 60
• holding that there was no error in granting the plaintiff’s motion for correction of a misnamed party defendant and in directing clerk to delete the words “a corporation” from the defendant’s name in the judgment, pursuant to FRCP 60
• holding it proper for district court to correct party misnomer under Rule 60(a)
• affirming a district court’s “proper[] . . . correction of a misnomer under Rule 60(a)”
• amending defendant's name in the judgment after trial where \it [was] clear that it was [the amended defendant] which the plaintiff sought to hold liable\
• awarding Rule 38 damages after three appeals in which there was no pretense to any ground for appeal other than the claim that the judgment was against the wrong entity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).