Fluker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a possible legislative intent in passing an anti-pandering statute as “protecting young females from physical injury or from the loss of‘chastity’ ”
• noting a possible legislative intent in passing an anti-pandering statute as “protecting young females from physical injury or from the loss of ‘chastity’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ray v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1990-03-08· cited 17×
• Stanifer v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 7×
• Kendrick v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-03-13· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton
  Supreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 1,264×
• Orr v. Orr
  Supreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 714×
• Califano v. Goldfarb
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-02· cited 384×
• Lamar v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-04-04· cited 51×
• Barnes v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-09-10· cited 49×
• Perini v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1980-01-08· cited 8×
• State v. Gaither
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-03-16· cited 7×
• Osborne v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1955-07-15· cited 3×