Fluke Corp. v. LeMaster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that facts that should cause suspicion are the same as actual knowledge
• noting that the statute of limitations began running when the plaintiffs “should have reasonably suspected that the [product] was not working properly and investi gated this possibility”
• denying the application of the discovery rule in a personal-injury case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).