Floyd v. Town of Hollywood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that two instances of an alleged delay in providing a needed surgery do not stem from the same set of operative facts even though they both address a delay in care for a hernia
• explaining that two instances of an alleged delay in providing a needed surgery do not stem from the same set of operative facts even though they both address a delay in care for a hernia
• “[E]very day that the defendants improperly refused to treat Heard’s condition potentially constituted a new act of deliberate indifference.”
• “[S]ettlement agreements generally do not give rise to issue preclusion—as opposed to claim preclusion—unless it is clear that preclusion is what the parties intended.”
• “every day that the defendants improperly refused to treat [plaintiff’s] condition potentially constituted a new act of deliberate indifference”
• “[E]very day that the defendants improperly refused to treat Heard’s condition potentially constituted a new act of deliberate indifference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).