District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/2/2005
Floyd v. State
Citations
- 893 So. 2d 588
- 2005 WL 233934
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because neither the letter nor the subsequently filed motion for rehearing was timely, the time for filing the notice of appeal was not tolled.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LozanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-10· cited 20×
- Childs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-07· cited 5×
- Whipple v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-02· cited 5×
- L.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-22· cited 4×
- Floyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-04· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.