Floyd v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the HFO statute did not specifically allow for the imposition of the fine required by chapter 893, that fine constituted an illegal sentence
• reversing summary denial of rule 3.800(a) motion challenging imposition of $10,000 fine for violation of section 893.135(1)(b)1.a., Fla. Stat. (1991

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Willits v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-07· cited 6×
• Baker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-29· cited 4×
• Harper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-03· cited 4×
• McGraw v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-18· cited 1×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-06· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Webster v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-28· cited 11×