Skip to main content

Floyd v. State

Citations

  • 643 S.W.2d 555
  • 278 Ark. 86
  • 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that conviction for theft was admissible for impeachment because it is a crime of dishonesty
  • holding that, because Floyd’s convictions for burglary and theft were crimes involving dishonesty pursuant to Rule 609, they were admissible without the weighing test
  • finding that because the defendant’s prior convictions for burglary and theft were crimes involving dishonesty, they were admissible to impeach under Rule 609

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hickman, Purtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.