Floyd v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Assuming, without deciding, that the statement was exculpatory, the state did not suppress the evidence because the prosecutor introduced it at trial, and Floyd had ample opportunity to cross-examine [the witness].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nelson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-06-16· cited 19×
• Warren v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-01-08· cited 11×
• Robinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-11-02· cited 8×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-12-07· cited 6×
• Callahan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-07-07· cited 6×
• In re Lee
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-05-01· cited 4×
• Griffin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-05-23· cited 1×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-27
• Christopher F. Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-27

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Strickler v. Greene
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
• Dennard v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 55×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1988-05-26· cited 16×
• Nikitin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-10-10· cited 15×
• Gresham v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1995-10-16· cited 12×
• Mondy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-09-02· cited 10×