Floyd v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a per se rule of recusal . . . will eliminate even the suggestion of partiality”
• adopting, as a matter of policy, a per se rule of recusal that a judge who presided over a defendant’s criminal trial cannot preside over a subsequent post-conviction relief proceeding
• adopting, as a matter of policy, a per se rule of recusal that a judge who presided over a defendant's criminal trial cannot preside over a subsequent post-conviction relief proceeding
• adopting “a per se rule of recusal” when the same judge who presided over a criminal trial is asked to preside over a post-conviction relief proceeding for the same defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bruce
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-05-27· cited 7×
• State v. Robinson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-04-23· cited 3×
• Alexander v. People
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-12-06· cited 2×
• State v. Watkins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-12-04· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Henry v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-02· cited 1×