Floyd v. Quaker Oats

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating requirement of increased hazard or exertion only applies to claims of heart attack and mental illness
• finding sufficient evidence to show cumulative injury to worker’s knee, which 14 occurred subsequent to initial work-related knee injury
• discussing agency finding distinguishing permanent impairment caused by work injury and additional impairment caused by subsequent aggravation
• noting our decision in Celotex Corp. v. Auten, 541 N.W.2d 252 (Iowa 1995
• “Loss of the use of a scheduled member is equivalent to the loss of that member.”
• “Full compensation is allowed for the result of workplace activities aggravating a preexisting condition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).