Flowers v. EZPawn Oklahoma, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the court must “take the allegations as true for purposes of the motion to remand”
• observing that “the Court must take the allegations as true for purposes of the motion to remand”
• stating that “the Court must take the allegations as true for purposes of the motion to remand,” and noting that the court had before it only the plaintiff’s 6 Elevate submits the following: (1
• no complete preemption where plaintiff's claims were only brought against non-bank defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).