Flowers v. Board of Professional Responsibility

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding one-year suspension and requirement of restitution when attorney misappropriated client funds and finding ABA Standard 4.12 to be applicable
• “[W]e subscribe to Chief Justice Cardozo’s view that ‘[m]embership in the bar is a privilege burdened with conditions.’” (second alteration in original)
• “Parties are required to provide citation and support identifying where in the record evidence can be found” as “judges are not like pigs, hunting for truffles buried in the record.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).