Skip to main content
· 1/15/1841

Flower v. O'Connor

Citations

  • 17 La. 213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the mere fact that a periodic [mortgage] statement complies with TILA does not exonerate the sender because a communication can have more than one purpose, for example, providing information to a debtor as well as collecting a debt.”
  • “this is an attempt to collect a debt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.