Flower v. Elwood
Citations
- 66 Ill. 438
Syllabus
<p>1. Payment—what will amount to. As a general rule, only payment, or something done and accepted as payment or satisfaction, can be held to discharge an obligation. When anything else than payment is accepted as satisfaction, it must appear that such was the intention of the j c</p> <p>3. Same—effect of surrender of note as evidence of Although the surrender of promissory notes by the holder to the maker is prima facie evideuce of their payment, still such presumption may be rebutted by other proof.</p> <p>8. Mortgage—special release construed. Where a mortgagee, in pursuance of a stipulation in the mortgage to that effect, gave a release in favor of the United States to enable the mortgagor to commence the distillery business, which stipulated “that the lien of the United States for taxes and penalties should have priority of said above mentioned mortgage, and in case of the forfeiture of the distillery premises, or any part thereof, the title shall vest in the United States, discharged from said mortgage, and for that purpose the said party of the first part does hereby remise, release,” etc., which release was duly recorded: Held, as against a party claiming title under a junior incumbrance, that the instrument did not operate as a general release of the premises from the prior mortgage, but that its only effect was to give the government a priority of lien.</p> <p>4. Same—whether satisfied by taking new notes with personal security. Where a mortgage, given upon distillery property, provided for the release of the same in favor of the United States in a certain event, upon the mortgagee being indemnified by certain personal security, and before the contingency arose, the latter assigned the first of the notes named in the mortgage to A, and the two next of the series to B, and indorsed a part of the mortgage to B, retaining the fourth and last note, and afterwards, upon the mortgagor giving new notes with personal security, the mortgagee and B surrendered the o
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where creditor purchases at the execution sale, he is entitled to have the payment of his debt, evidenced by his receipt, credited as a payment on his bid in lieu of cash, where there is no question that his debt is a first lien on the purchase price
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.