Skip to main content
· 5/22/1905

Flournoy v. Miller

Citations

  • 114 La. 1028
  • 38 So. 818
  • 1905 La. LEXIS 584

Syllabus

<p>VENDOR AND PURCHASER— CONDITIONAL PROMISE OP SALE — APPROVAL OP TITLE.</p> <p>1. The promise to sell was made on condition that the sale would be completed if the property was unincumbered and the title good. The matter of incumbrance and of title was left to the attorneys named in the written promise to sell.</p> <p>2. The attorneys did not approve the title within the appointed time. The time appointed to sign the deed of sale elapsed.</p> <p>3. The promisor cannot be held bound to complete the deed. The condition of the agreement was in the interest of both promisor and promisee.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Many cases from this and other circuits have held that individuals cannot be held personally liable for damages under the ADA, regardless of which title of the ADA is at issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.