Skip to main content
· 8/1/1996

Flour Bluff Independent School District v. Katherine M. Ex Rel. Lesa T.

Citations

  • 91 F.3d 689
  • 1996 WL 428503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “One of the obvious purposes of the ‘stay-put’ provision is to reduce the chance of a child being bounced from one school to another, only to have the location changed again by an appellate court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Garwood, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.