· 8/1/1996
Flour Bluff Independent School District v. Katherine M. Ex Rel. Lesa T.
Citations
- 91 F.3d 689
- 1996 WL 428503
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “One of the obvious purposes of the ‘stay-put’ provision is to reduce the chance of a child being bounced from one school to another, only to have the location changed again by an appellate court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reavley, Garwood, Demoss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.