Skip to main content
· 3/29/1996

Flory v. USA

Citations

  • 79 F.3d 24
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 473
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6365
  • 1996 WL 112604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “just because the Government chose to pursue a dismissal on the merits prior to pursuing a jurisdictional defense, that does not mean that the Government waived its jurisdictional defense under Rule 12(h)(1)”
  • “Because the dismissal of [the] complaint is affirmed, [the] motion to intervene . . . is DENIED as moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Stewart, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.