Skip to main content
· 3/19/1929

Florida Trust & Banking Co. v. Hancock

Citations

  • 120 So. 847
  • 97 Fla. 379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that when futurity is annexed to the substance of the gift as opposed to the enjoyment, the gift is contingent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Whitfield, Buford, Strum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.