Skip to main content
· 12/17/1996

Florida State University v. Sondel

Citations

  • 685 So. 2d 923
  • 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13591
  • 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,927
  • 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1001
  • 1996 WL 720617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Petitioner must prove that the reason articulated by the Respondent was false and that discrimination was the real reason for the Respondent’s actions.”
  • \The Petitioner must prove that the reason articulated by the Respondent was false and that discrimination was the real reason for the Respondent's actions.\
  • “Federal case law interpreting Title VII and the ADEA is applicable to cases arising under the Florida Act”
  • “The [FCRA], as amended, was patterned after Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts . . . as well as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act . . . . Federal case law interpreting Title VII and the ADEA is applicable to cases arising under the Florida Act.”
  • “The [FCRA], as amended, was patterned after Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts . . . as well as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act . . . . Federal case law interpreting Title VII and the ADEA is applicable to cases arising under the Florida Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.