· 12/17/1996
Florida State University v. Sondel
Citations
- 685 So. 2d 923
- 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13591
- 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,927
- 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1001
- 1996 WL 720617
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Petitioner must prove that the reason articulated by the Respondent was false and that discrimination was the real reason for the Respondent’s actions.”
- \The Petitioner must prove that the reason articulated by the Respondent was false and that discrimination was the real reason for the Respondent's actions.\
- “Federal case law interpreting Title VII and the ADEA is applicable to cases arising under the Florida Act”
- “The [FCRA], as amended, was patterned after Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts . . . as well as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act . . . . Federal case law interpreting Title VII and the ADEA is applicable to cases arising under the Florida Act.”
- “The [FCRA], as amended, was patterned after Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts . . . as well as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act . . . . Federal case law interpreting Title VII and the ADEA is applicable to cases arising under the Florida Act.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.