Skip to main content
· 3/15/1930

Florida Power & Light Co. v. Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific Co.

Citations

  • 38 F.2d 948
  • 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the purpose of Rule 65’s notice requirement is to “give the opposing party a fair opportunity to oppose the motion for a preliminary injunction” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
  • “The court never told Rosen that it was considering an injunction. Thus, Rosen had no notice that an injunction might be entered against him, and no fair 8 opportunity to oppose it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryan, Sibley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.