Florida Outdoor Equipment Inc. v. Tomlinson (In Re Tomlinson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the defendant “merely sought to maintain the corporation as an ongoing enterprise” he did not act with the necessary fraudulent intent
• holding that the “willful” standard requires evidence that the debtor had “motive to harm” the creditor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).